Misha in memoriam

by Nagesh Havanur
11/15/2018 – Last week saw the birth anniversary of Mikhail Tal, (1936-1992) 8th World Champion and legendary player. Few players captured the imagination of the chess world as he and Bobby Fischer did. We offered him a small tribute and here is another by our columnist who also draws our attention to a slim volume that deserves to be better known. | Photo: Riga greets Tal

On this DVD Dorian Rogozenco, Mihail Marin, Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller present the 8. World Chess Champion in video lessons: his openings, his understanding of chess strategy, his artful endgame play, and finally his immortal combinations.

The prankster from Riga

A group of boys has gathered near the telephone booth. Eager and excited, they want their ringleader to make the first move. “Go in and call. They won’t know a thing” he nudges his friend. “You said, you were going to do it.” “Never mind, it’s your turn. I shall back you up if something goes wrong.”

“Hello, Good Morning. Is this the zoo?”

“Yes, what can we do for you?”

“Would you call the Director?”

“He is busy in a meeting…”

“This is a call from Moscow. Tell him, it’s urgent and important”. By now the receptionist is on red alert and calls the Director on the other line.

“What is it? I told you I won’t be disturbed.”

“Comrade, it’s a call from Moscow.”

“Give it to me immediately”

“Sorry, sorry. I am the Director. I could have called you myself if I had known... What can do I for you?”

“Never mind, comrade. Do you have an elephant in your zoo?’

elephant

Photo Credit: Centre for Baltic Heritage

“Yes, he is well looked after. I hope, no one has made a complaint on that account.”

“No, we do have a message for him. Could you call him right him away?”

The Director, bemused, asks, “What? The elephant… in my office…?” and then getting the “message”, roars, “Who are you? What kind of nonsense is this? I shall have you….” 

It takes some time for him to realise that his caller has already put the phone down. The boy is out of the booth, grinning from ear to ear. His pal, laughing, shakes hands with him, “I told you, you could do it.” The rest of the friends gather around them. Congrats are in order. Then the little crowd, hooting and whistling, disappears from the street lest they be caught in the act.*

Team tal book cover

Team Tal book cover (click or tap to expand) — the boys, Misha and Valentin lived in Riga

This slim volume is the story of the two boys. One grew up to be world champion and a living legend. The other made only modest progress. He became a chess coach and a journalist. More importantly, he took care of his friend in a critical period of his life and remained loyal to him till the end. Welcome to the world of Misha Tal and Valentin Kirillov.

Kirillov and Tal

Kirillov and Tal | Photo: Team Tal, Elk and Ruby Publishing House, 2017

Admittedly, this book is only for Tal fans.  If your aim is no more than raising your rating from 2200 to 2400 it’s not for you. There is hardly any game in it. But if you are not the narrow utilitarian type you will want to read this book.

The narrative itself goes back and forth, with the author going down the memory lane. So in this part of the story I shall only mention only a few highlights.

The boys, Misha and Valentin lived in Riga. It was here that they met their mentor, Alexander Koblenz.

Koblenz Aivar Gipslis and TalUnder Alexander Koblenz (photo [right]: publiclibrary.ru Archives) as their mentor, they became firm friends. There were also other talented players like Janis Klovans and Aivar Gipslis (seen here with young Misha | photo [left]: Chessnews.ru). The young Latvians shone competing with older and more experienced teams from Moscow and Leningrad.

What I found in the story touching was young Misha’s eagerness to help his team mates, be it opening analysis or adjournment. If someone lost, he would be all tact, cheer him up and assure him, he would do better next time. With success, he spent more time in Moscow and he lost contact with old friends like Valentin who also drifted away with changing careers. But the same affectionate ties remained between the boyhood friends.

Misha meets the legends of his time

One of the first tournaments young Misha played was the USSR Championship 1956.** Here he met quite a few illustrious figures in chess history:

Levenfish and Tal

Tal with Grigory Levenfish who had crossed swords with Lasker, Capablanca, & Alekhine and also won the USSR Championship way back in 1937 | Photo: Team Tal, Elk and Ruby Publishing House, 2017

Tolush and Flohr with Tal

With Alexander Tolush (seated) and Salo Flohr, a great contemporary of Botvinnik, Reshevsky, Keres & Fine. Tal beat Tolush in a fierce combinational struggle in this championship. Their rivalry was to last three years. | Photo: Team Tal, Elk and Ruby Publishing House, 2017

A modest debut

The USSR Championship had a relatively “weak”field in that the big guns, Botvinnik, Smyslov and Keres were not playing. Nevertheless, it was still strong with experienced campaigners, Averbakh, Boleslavsky, Ragozin, Taimanov and Tolush participating. The younger lot included Spassky, Korchnoi and Polugaevsky. It would have intimidated any newcomer. Not Misha. In the first round he escaped with a draw after getting into trouble with Antoshin. In the second round he outplayed Khasin and finished the game with a neat queen sacrifice.

A scintillating Performance

Simagin

Then came the third round and here he met Vladimir Simagin (photo: Wikireading.ru).

The veteran master was a highly original player and his openings drew their inspiration from the Hypermoderns, especially, Tartakower. 

Here's a stunning performance that made headlines in the chess world and served as a “visiting card” of the new talent. It also led to a lively debate. One commentator who was effusive in his praise of the game was Igor Bondarevsky (the well-known trainer who later became a mentor of Boris Spassky.

Tal-Simagin, USSR Championship 1956

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,165,57054%2421---
1.d4946,47455%2434---
1.Nf3281,31256%2441---
1.c4181,93756%2442---
1.g319,68856%2427---
1.b314,23654%2427---
1.f45,88648%2377---
1.Nc33,79651%2384---
1.b41,75348%2380---
1.a31,19754%2403---
1.e31,06848%2408---
1.d394850%2378---
1.g466246%2361---
1.h444653%2374---
1.c342651%2425---
1.h327956%2416---
1.a410860%2468---
1.f39147%2431---
1.Nh38966%2508---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.e4 c6 The Caro-Kann Defence. 2.d4 d6 Did you say,“This pawn is too lazy to move to d5"? No, it’s Simagin’s own system that he has played before. 2...d5 is standard. 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f4 Qb6 Simagin did not try his old line on account of 4...Qa5 5.Bd2 Qb6 6.Nf3 and now it would be too dangerous for the Black queen to take the b-pawn. 5.Nf3 Peter Clarke prefers 5.Be2 to prevent...Bg4 pinning the knight. 5...Bg4 6.Be2 Nbd7? Here Simagin suggested 6...e6 7.0-0 Be7 His other suggestion was 6...Bxf3 7.Bxf3 e5 8.fxe5 dxe5 9.dxe5 Nfd7 7.e5 Nd5 7...dxe5? 8.fxe5 Nd5 9.0-0 offers White a big lead in development. 8.0-0 Nxc3? We are still following Simagin's commentary that offered 8...Bxf3 9.Bxf3 e6 instead. 9.bxc3 e6? This move is now too late. 9...Bxf3 10.Bxf3 e6 was the last chance, though White would have the initiative with control of centre and chances of breakthrough. 9...g6!? followed by 10... Bg7 is another Simagin idea. 10.Ng5! Bxe2 11.Qxe2 h6! Simagin provokes the sacrifice hoping that his young rival would lose his way in the ensuing complications. It's too late for 11...Be7? 12.exd6 Bxd6 13.f5+- 12.Nxf7! Kxf7 13.f5 dxe5 14.fxe6+ Kxe6 15.Rb1‼ Sheer magic!Tal had seen this move when he sacrificed his knight on f7. Qxb1 16.Qc4+ Kd6 17.Ba3+ Kc7 18.Rxb1 Bxa3 19.Qb3 Be7 20.Qxb7+ Kd6 21.dxe5+? With boyish spirit our hero keeps on giving checks and they help the fleeing king to escape (well, almost). Ragozin's's suggestion 21.Rd1!+- threatening both dxe5+ and also d4-d5 would have brought the whole game to an end. 21...Nxe5 22.Rd1+ Ke6 23.Qb3+ Kf5 24.Rf1+ Ke4 25.Re1+ Kf5 26.g4+ Kf6 27.Rf1+ Kg6 28.Qe6+ Kh7 29.Qxe5 Rhe8 30.Rf7 Bf8 31.Qf5+ Kg8 32.Kf2?! Call it youthful optimism or bravado. The king sets out on a march under a hail of bullets, declaring "I want to deliver mate myself." Instead Ragozin offers 32.Qg6! Re1+ 33.Kg2 Rae8 34.Rf1+- Karolyi's 34.Rf3+- is also good. 32...Bc5+ 33.Kg3 Re3+ 34.Kh4 Rae8? 34...Be7+ was more dangerous and here Simagin offered 35.g5! Tal of course had a characteristic idea, 35.Kh5 Rd8 36.Rxg7+ Kxg7 37.Qg6+ Kf8 38.Qxh6+ Kf7 39.Qxe3 But after Rh8+ 40.Qh6 Rxh6+ 41.Kxh6 there is only a draw. 35...Bxg5+ 36.Kh5 Rae8 37.Qg6 Rh3+ 38.Kg4 Rh4+ 39.Kg3 Re3+ 40.Kf2 Rf4+ 41.Rxf4 Bxf4 42.Qxc6 Re7 43.Qd5+ with winning chances. 35.Rxg7+! Kxg7 36.Qxc5 R8e6? Here Karolyi offers the brilliant resource, 36...Rf3! 37.Qxa7+ Kg6 and shows how White wins thereafter wth 38.Qg1! Ree3 39.Qg2+- Black's attack runs out of steam and there is no way of stopping the race of the a-pawn to queening. 37.Qxa7+ Kg6? This time it's the turn of the old monarch to try and checkmate his audacious adversary! But it's fatal. 37...Re7 was more tenacious, though it would have lost in the long run. 38.Qa8 Kf6 39.a4 Ke5 40.a5 Kd5 41.Qd8+ Ke4 42.a6 Kf3 43.a7 Re2 He could have still tried to mate his adversary with 43...Kg2 There would have followed 44.Qd2+ Re2 45.Qxe2+! Rxe2 46.a8Q+- 44.Qd3+ R2e3 45.Qxe3+ An elegant finale! This game was beautifully annotated by Simagin (yes, he loved the kid who beat him!) and Ragozin. It was late Peter Clarke who made their commentary available to English language readers. In recent years Tibor Karolyi has come up with some astonishing analysis in his trilogy on Tal (Quality Chess). All of which merit appreciaton. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Tal,M-Simagin,V-1–01956B07URS-ch23
Tal,M-Simagin,V-1–01956B07URS-ch23
Tal,M-Simagin,V-1–0 B07URS-ch23

Spassky and Bondarevsky

Bondarevsky (right) with his protégé, Boris Spassky | Photo: e3e5.com

However, Bondarevsky also made some critical remarks on Simagin’s idiosyncratic opening play in his report in the tournament bulletin. Stung by the criticism, Simagin wrote an indignant letter to the editors, justifying his play.

The game had another curious aftermath. Simagin was the Editor of the Yearbook of Chess and here he offered a fine analysis of Tal’s games in the Championship. While he lavished praise on the Latvian for his inspired play he also marked his overindulgence in combinative play and fantasy, not to mention carelessness and lack of technique.

Tal acts in a film

The present generation of players knows Simagin only as the loser of this game. His own chess career was relatively modest as compared to leading grandmasters of the day. But Tal did not measure people in terms of their sporting success. He saw a genuine creative artist in Simagin. He used to tell others, “Simagin is the Don Quixote of chess.” The Russian film, “Grossmeister” (Grandmaster) (1972) is said to be inspired by his life.

According to Kirillov, the author of this book, Tal was even asked to play the lead role. In the end, it did not come about. However, both Tal and Korchnoi enjoyed themselves as supporting actors:

Tal and Korchnoi flying high in film

The true knight of the chessboard

Why did Tal admire Simagin so much? Take a look at the position here:

 
Simagin vs Stein, 1961
White to move

Play your moves on the live diagram!

Simagin has three pieces en prise. Meanwhile, his opponent is threatening mate in two. So what did he do? Give it a try and then see it for yourself.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,165,57054%2421---
1.d4946,47455%2434---
1.Nf3281,31256%2441---
1.c4181,93756%2442---
1.g319,68856%2427---
1.b314,23654%2427---
1.f45,88648%2377---
1.Nc33,79651%2384---
1.b41,75348%2380---
1.a31,19754%2403---
1.e31,06848%2408---
1.d394850%2378---
1.g466246%2361---
1.h444653%2374---
1.c342651%2425---
1.h327956%2416---
1.a410860%2468---
1.f39147%2431---
1.Nh38966%2508---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 h6 8.Bh4 Qb6 Simagin wrote, "Neglecting development, Black throws his main piece to conquer enemy pawns. I am convinced, such a strategy should lead him to a losing position. The individual failures of White players in this variation testify only to the imperfect conduct of attack. The struggle becomes so sharp that the slightest inaccuracy by White immediately worsens his chances and in some cases even leads to a quick loss." With the benefit of hindsight one can observe that Black has stood his ground. 9.Qd2 Qxb2 10.Rb1 Qa3 11.Bxf6 11.f5 Be7 12.fxe6 fxe6 13.Bc4 is met by Nxe4! 11...gxf6 "After this exchange, the Black king will not find a peaeful haven on the kingside. But first, White should take care of his own king."-Simagin.Indeed, in such positions the Black king is safer in the centre and has no plans to castle on the kingside. 12.Be2 h5 13.0-0 Nd7 14.Kh1 Qc5 15.Rf3 15.Bf3 preparing e4-e5 is met by Bh6! and Black threatens both...Bxf4 and...Ne5. Perhaps White has no better than 15.Na4! Qa3 16.Nb6 Nxb6 17.Rxb6 Qc5= here. Not 17...Qxa2? 18.Qc3!+- 15...Be7 16.Rh3 h4 17.f5 "Hasty decision. Now White's control of central square e5 is weakened and it can be occuped by a Black piece." Simagin. But what should White play? Simagin's suggestion 17.Nd1 preparing c3 and Qb3 loses control of the centre and taking advantage of the same Black plays d5! Now 18.exd5 Or 18.Nc3 Nb6= 18...Qxd5 is level. 17.a4!? deserves attention. 17...Nb6 18.Nd1 "The position remains very tense, and the extra Black pawn is not a significant factor"-Simagin Nc4 19.Qc3 Ne5 20.Qb2 b5 21.Ne3 Bd7 22.c3 Rc8 23.Rc1 Bd8 24.Qb3 Ke7 25.Qd1 Bb6 26.Qf1 Qa3 27.Rd1! The immediate 27.fxe6 fxe6 28.Ndf5+ is met by Kf7! Not 28...exf5? 29.Nd5++- 27...Rxc3 Simagin wrote, "Accepting the sacrifice is too risky. It was necessary to defend the d6 pawn by 27. . . Bc5. As it turned out after the game, Black considered his position advantageous and wanted to quickly break White's resistance." It is only now that we know that Stein was playing for higher stakes than a mere pawn. 27...Bc5 28.fxe6 fxe6 29.Ndf5+ Kd8 Not 29...exf5? 30.Nd5++- 30.Nxd6 Rf8! Stein protects the most vulnerable point in his position before launching his own attack. 30...Rxe3? does not work yet on account of 31.Qxf6+ Kc7 32.Qxe5+- Simagin thought 30...Ke7 was wrong on account of 31.Ndf5+ Kd8 32.Bxb5 Perhaps he had missed something here. On Instead after 32.Nd4 the game is level. 32...axb5 33.Qxb5 Qc5 Black is winning. 31.Rxh4! "This move extinguishes the hopes of the opponent" -Simagin After 31.Ng4? Stein had intended Rxh3 32.Nxe5 Rxh2+! 33.Kxh2 Qg3+ 34.Kh1 Qxe5-+ 31...Rxe3? Igor Zatisev gave a fine piece of analysis with 31...Bc7! 32.Rh8 Bxd6 33.Rxf8+ Bxf8 When Lubomir Kavalek offered this position to the engines, they came up with 33...Kc7‼ 34.Qxf6 Or 34.Rxd6 Qxd6 35.Rxf6 Qd4 36.Nd1 Ra3 37.Qf2 Qxf2 38.Rxf2 Rxa2 39.h4 b4 40.h5 Be8 41.h6 Bg6-+ 34...Rxe3 35.Qd8+ Kb7 36.Bf1 Bxf8 37.Rxd7+ Nxd7 38.Qxd7+ Kb6 39.Qd8+ Kc6 40.Qc8+ Kd6‼ 41.Qxf8+ Ke5-+ 34.Qxf6+ Kc8 35.Qxe5 Rxe3 36.Qd4 Bc6 37.Qb6 Bd7 38.Qd4 Bc6= Draw by repetition of moves. 32.Rh8 Rxh8?? The decisive error. Black has a draw by repetition of moves with 32...Ng6! 33.Rh7 Ne5 34.Rh8 Ng6 as shown by Kavalek. 33.Qxf6+ Kc7 34.Qxe5 Kc6 35.Nxb5 Qc5 35...axb5?? 36.Bxb5++- 35...Qe7? leads to a picturesque mate. 36.Rd6+ Kb7 37.Rxb6+! Kxb6 38.Qc7# 36.Rd6+ Kb7 37.Rxd7+ Kc8 A fantastic position! White has all pieces en prise and in addition Black threatens mate in two. Now Simagin comes up with a stunning move that he had prepared. 38.Rc7+‼ Qxc7 38...Bxc7?? 39.Qxc5+- is just one point of the combination. 39.Nxc7 Rxh2+! Just one move before the time control Stein sets a brilliant trap. 40.Qxh2 Simagin sidesteps the mine field just in time. 40.Kxh2?? Bxc7-+ would have turned the tables on White. 40...Rxe2 41.Qh8+ Kxc7 The rest is a matter of technique, though Stein fights to the bitter end. 42.Qc3+ Kb7 43.Qc4 Re1+ 44.Kh2 Bc7+ 45.Kh3 Rh1+ 46.Kg4 Rh2 47.Kf3 Rh6 48.Qb4+ Kc6 49.Qc3+ Kb7 49...Kd7 loses to 50.Qg7++- 50.Qb2+ Kc8 51.Qg7 Rh5 52.Qg8+ Kb7 53.Qxe6 Ra5 54.g4 and it was only now that Stein resigned. A spirited contest in which honours go to both combatants. Tal adored Simagin and shared a bond with Stein. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Simagin,V-Stein,L-1–01961B96URS-ch28 Final & Zonal

A game that Tal would have loved to play himself!

Simagin's grave

A grave for a restless spirit (click or tap to expand) | Photo: SerSem CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

To be continued...

In the next part of this article let us see more of Tal and his devoted friend who wrote this book.

*I have used some creative license to imagine the whole scene. Otherwise, yes, they did call up the zoo with a “message” for the elephant.

** Tal scored 10½/17 points sharing 5th-7th places with Kholmov and Polugaevsky. He finished half a point behind Korchnoi and one point behind the winners, Averbakh, Spassky and Taimanov.  Author, Tibor Karolyi put the performance in perspective, “Tal scored remarkably well against the bottom eight players, scoring seven points, but against the top nine opponents he scored seven draws and two defeats without a single win.”

(Mikhail Tal’s Best Games Vol.1 The Magic of Youth, Quality Chess.2014)

He was only 20 and his best was yet to come.


Prof. Nagesh Havanur (otherwise known as "chessbibliophile") is a senior academic and research scholar. He taught English in Mumbai for three decades and has now settled in Bangalore, India. His interests include chess history, biography and opening theory. He has been writing on the Royal Game for more than three decades. His articles and reviews have appeared on several web sites and magazines.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.